The Black Death – Ellen Kearney



Striking Italy in 1348 the Black Death had disastrous effects on the
European population, which in 1347 was sitting comfortably around 75 million
inhabitants, by 1352 had fallen to a mere 50 million. This fall in population
resulted in severe labour shortages, subsequently leading to higher wages, resulting
economic disruption and the end of feudalism. Socially, smaller communities
evaporated, fleeing to cities where disease and plague spread rapidly.
Community ideals were lost as many individuals sought to preserve their own
lives. There was a resulting impact upon the Church as many prayed for
deliverance from the plague, and were forced to question their philosophical
ideals.
![]() |
Illustration of the Black Death from the Toggenburg Bible (1411) |
~ ~ ~
The movement in ideas and arts that would eventually become
known as the Renaissance was interrupted by the arrival of the Black Death in
Europe. Now known as the Yersinia pestis,
the plague probably assumed all of its known in Europe from the 14th to
18th centuries. The most common form of the plague however was the
bubonic infection, which was carried fleas, in turn carried by rodents. The
plagues septicaemic form entered the bloodstream causing death within hours and
the pneumonic form entered the body through the lungs, spread by droplets and
would kill a person within days. This from was spread from person to person
rather than via fleas.
The Black Death originated in Asia, arriving at Messina in
1347, Sicily, where it was borne by merchant galleys that had traded with
Byzantium and Crimea. From here rats carrying the disease came onto Italian
soil, traveling throughout the winter of 1347-8, flaring up in the summer, and
tens of thousands died, and populations declined by rates of one or two thirds.
The plague was worst in urban areas, although it hit the country side hard as
well. The rural population had been weakened by waves of famine from 1339-40
and 1356-7. The plague returned in each new generation, although with less
force then the first years, carrying off the elderly and the young.
When the plague first struck in 1348, Italy was completely
unprepared, and as a result was unable to resist. The physicians trained in
theory from Galen and Aristotle, originating from around c.130-c.201 C.E., and
were ignorant of infections, contagion and quarantine. With no antidote,
doctors would refuse to treat infected people, some thinking that the plague
was a result of poisoned air, recommending moderate habits, filtered air and
closed windows.
There was an upheaval to their lives, as they were unable to
live as they used to. Shown by the interruption of their progression towards
the renaissance, they became less focused on this and more on survival, as the
plague left a swathe of dead across Europe. Fathers would abandon their sick
sons, and bodies went unburied, as the church was unable to help. In some
places the members of the church had fled with the rest of the population, and
in others they had helped care for the sick. This brought the plague to them,
and in many cases heavily reduced the population of its members.
--Callon
[Editor's note: Matthew's contribution to come...]
4 comments:
One thing that I was thinking was that it is testement to how mobile and international Medieval Europe had become to enable the plague spread so effectively and quickly. It is interesting that some of the best developments in Europe occyrred simultaneously with the population increases and when population began to decrease again, priorites altered away from technology and progress towards preservation and conservativeness. It must have been an increbible period to have lived through with such uncertianty about your own future and the future of your family but also the uncertain future of the known world. I was wondering how the plague affected the Church. I think it ws good time for religious observation as periods of crisis usually are but the clergy themselves must have got sick and living in close confines would have made them suseptable to outbreaks. Was there a dramatic decline in the numbers of Churchmen and was the plague attributed to the work of God in any way?
Good luck everybody who is on this week!
Sorry for the terrible spelling, I really should read these things first :-(
Some may have blamed the church (did anyone find direct evidence of this?), but their understanding of human nature and sin may have led them to a more horrifying conclusion, such as that they - each of them, as Christians - were responsible because of their sinful lives. There was plenty of Biblical precedent for God's punishment being wrought on whole peoples, after all...
Incidentally, anyone looking for a good read over the break might like to look up Doomsday Book by Connie Willis in their local library. It's a historical fantasy/sci-fi novel dealing with this period, in England. Although the storyline is completely fanciful, I think it captures a kind of emotional realism about the plague era. And it's a fab read in general.
I found the social upheaval incredibly interesting. By social I mean the complete 'fend for yourselves' attitude that was undertaken by most, as Ellen and Callon mentioned in their blog posts, fathers abandoning children etc. I'm not sure where I read this but I also found the change from the feudal system very interesting, as the lack of people led to a greater need for workers and hence greater bargaining powers of the peasants, which has and could easily be argued as the beginnings of capitalism.
Post a Comment